4.8 Article

Aging promotes acquisition of naive-like CD8+ memory T cell traits and enhanced functionalities

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 126, Issue 10, Pages 3942-3960

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI88546

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [AG026518, AI093637, LM008111, LM009254, AI06877, AI066121, T32 AI007405, AI052066]
  2. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation [CDA-2-2007-240]
  3. Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center [P30-DK057516]
  4. American Heart Association [13SDG14510023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protective T cell memory is an acquired trait that is contingent upon the preservation of its constituents and therefore vulnerable to the potentially deleterious effects of organismal aging. Here, however, we have found that long-term T cell memory in a natural murine host-pathogen system can substantially improve over time. Comprehensive molecular, phenotypic, and functional profiling of aging antiviral CD8(+) memory T cells (CD8(+) T-M) revealed a pervasive remodeling process that promotes the gradual acquisition of distinct molecular signatures, of increasingly homogeneous phenotypes, and of diversified functionalities that combine to confer a CD8(+) T-M-autonomous capacity for enhanced recall responses and immune protection. Notably, the process of CM8(+) T-M aging is characterized by a progressive harmonization of memory and naive T cell traits, is broadly amenable to experimental acceleration or retardation, and serves as a constitutional component for the rebound model of memory T cell maturation. By casting CM8(+) T-M populations within the temporal framework of their slowly evolving properties, this model establishes a simple ontogenetic perspective on the principal organization of CD8(+) T cell memory that may directly inform the development of improved diagnostic, prophylactic, and therapeutic modalities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available