3.8 Article

Evaluation of modelled LOTOS-EUROS with observational based PM10 source attribution

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT-X
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100173

Keywords

Source attribution; Air pollution; Chemistry transport model; Germany; Particulate matter; PMF

Funding

  1. German Environment Agency (UBA) in Dessau-Rosslau [FKZ 3716 51 203 0]
  2. Berlin Senate Department for the Environment, Transport and Climate Protection in Berlin
  3. Saxon State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology (LfULG) in Dresden-Pillnitz
  4. State Office for the Environment (LfU) of the Federal State of Brandenburg in Potsdam
  5. State Office for Environment, Nature and Geology (LUNG) of the Federal State of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania in Gustrow

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared two different methods for attributing particulate matter concentrations to different sources. The results showed that the contributions from biomass and total combustion were consistent between the two methods, but the model had difficulties representing traffic emissions. Additionally, the modeled particulate matter concentrations underestimated the observed concentrations and were closely related to the contributions from combustion and secondary particulate matter.
Due to its serious health impact particulate matter is one of the air pollutants subject to abatement policies. Information on the main sources responsible for high concentrations of pollutants is therefore crucial to enable effective policy measures. In this study we compared two different methods for attribution of particulate matter concentrations to different sources: A tagging approach within the regional chemistry transport model LOTOSEUROS and an observational method using speciated particulate matter observations and Positive Matrix Factorisation (PMF). The methods have been applied for winter 2016/2017 over Eastern Germany where in wintertime high woodburning emissions, cold temperatures and regular easterly winds can lead to a build-up of pollutant concentrations. The comparison allows the validation of the modelled source attribution for a selection of source categories. The contributions for biomass and total combustion compare well between both methods providing trust in the determined contributions, applied emissions including their timing. The total contribution from combustion is estimated between 3.3-7.7 mu g/m(3) (PMF) and 3.3-7.2 mu g/m(3) (LOTOS-EUROS) for the 9 stations incorporated in the study. The temporal Pearson correlation coefficient ranges between 0.3-0.64 for total combustion and 0.34 and 0.7 for biomass combustion. The mean absolute contributions for traffic at background stations also compare well with most values between 1.5-2.0 mu g/m(3) for PMF and 1-1.6 mu g/m(3) for LOTOS-EUROS. A lack of correlation for this contribution however suggests that the model has difficulty in representing the source category traffic in a time consistent manner and developments are needed to improve the temporal distribution of the traffic emissions within the model. The modelled particulate matter concentrations displayed a 20-40% underestimation of the observed concentrations with an increasing bias during high pollution events. The underestimation showed a high correlation with the observed contribution from combustion and secondary particulate matter including ammonium sulfate and organic carbon suggesting that at least a part of the missing mass in LOTOS-EUROS is related to transformation of volatile combustion emissions, likely from solid fuels, to secondary particle mass and missing enhanced formation of sulfate. Implementation of these missing processes would help to improve the source attribution of particulate matter with the LOTOS-EUROS model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available