3.8 Article

Altruism Does Not Predict Mating Success in Humans: A Direct Replication

Journal

EVOLUTIONARY BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 465-471

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/ebs0000298

Keywords

helping behavior; reproductive success; selflessness; sexual behavior; sexuality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found no association between altruistic behavior and indices of mating success in humans. The results are inconsistent with previous findings and further research is needed to determine whether altruism has an impact on mating success in different cultural contexts.
Altruistic behavior is predicted to be a costly signal that benefits an individual in terms of reproductive success. This study sought to directly replicate a previous investigation that demonstrated a positive association between altruism and indices of mating success (Arnocky et al., 2017). Participants (n = 445; 329 women, 116 men; M-age = 22.9 years) completed measures of altruism, personality, self-reported mating success, lifetime sexual partners, lifetime casual sex partners, and frequency of copulation with their current sexual partner. Linear regression models demonstrated that, across models both including and excluding the covariates of age and personality, altruism was unrelated to self-reported mating success, lifetime sexual partners, casual sexual partners, and frequency of copulation. Findings remained unchanged in sensitivity analyses with nonheterosexual participants removed from the sample and with data transformed to remove skewness. Overall, the findings are inconsistent with those of the original study and provide evidence that altruism does not predict mating success in humans. Further research is needed that tests for cross-cultural variation to determine whether altruism has a role in mating success across world regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available