4.0 Article

Best Practices for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement and Reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 127-140

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.03.003

Keywords

Accreditation; certification; DXA; osteoporosis; quality

Funding

  1. Amgen
  2. Eli Lily
  3. Novartis
  4. GE
  5. Hologic
  6. Ache
  7. EMS
  8. Hypermarcas
  9. Medimaps
  10. Merck
  11. GE Healthcare
  12. MSD
  13. Roche
  14. Gamble
  15. Hospira
  16. Servier
  17. Pfizer
  18. Bristol Myers Squibb
  19. Abbvie
  20. PG
  21. Centocor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a technology that is widely used to diagnose osteoporosis, assess fracture risk, and monitor changes in bone mineral density (BMD). The clinical utility of DXA is highly dependent on the quality of the scan acquisition, analysis, and interpretatidn. Clinicians are best equipped to manage patients when BMD measurements are correct and interpretation follows well-established standards. Poor-quality acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of DXA data may mislead referring clinicians, resulting in unnecessary diagnostic evaluations, failure to evaluate when needed, inappropriate treatment, or failure to provide medical treatment, with potentially ineffective, harmful, or costly consequences. Misallocation of limited healthcare resources and poor treatment decisions can be minimized, and patient care optimized, through meticulous attention to DXA instrument calibration, data acquisition and analysis, interpretation, and reporting. This document from the International Society for Clinical Densitometry describes quality standards for BMD testing at DXA facilities worldwide to provide guidance for DXA supervisors, technologists, interpreters, and clinicians. High-quality DXA testing is necessary for correct diagnostic classification and optimal fracture risk assessment, and is essential for BMD monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available