4.7 Article

Projected Changes in Western US Large-Scale Summer Synoptic Circulations and Variability in CMIP5 Models

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 29, Issue 16, Pages 5965-5978

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0598.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [AGS-1349847]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1349847] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large-scale synoptic circulations have a profound effect on western U.S. summer weather and climate. Heat waves, water availability, the distribution of monsoonal moisture, fire-weather conditions, and other phenomena are impacted by the position and amplitude of large-scale synoptic circulations. Furthermore, regional weather is modulated by the interactions of the large-scale flow with terrain and land-water contrasts. It is therefore crucial to understand projected changes in large-scale circulations and their variability under anthropogenic global warming. Although recent research has examined changes in the jet stream, storm tracks, and synoptic disturbances over the Northern Hemisphere under global warming, most papers have focused on the cold season. In contrast, this work analyzes the projected trends in the spatial distribution and amplitude of large-scale synoptic disturbances over the western United States and eastern Pacific during July and August. It is shown that CMIP5 models project weaker mean midtropospheric gradients in geopotential height as well as attenuated temporal variability in geopotential height, temperature, vorticity, vertical motion, and sea level pressure over this region. Most models suggest reduced frequency of troughs and increased frequency of ridges over the western United States. These changes in the variability of synoptic disturbances have substantial implications for future regional weather and climate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available