4.7 Article

Climate Feedback Variance and the Interaction of Aerosol Forcing and Feedbacks

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 29, Issue 18, Pages 6659-6675

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0151.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB955303]
  2. NSFC [41275070]
  3. National Science Foundation of China [41405010]
  4. China Scholarship council
  5. Regional and Global Climate Modeling Program of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Science [DE-FC02-97ER62402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aerosols can influence cloud radiative effects and, thus, may alter interpretation of how Earth's radiative budget responds to climate forcing. Three different ensemble experiments from the same climate model with different greenhouse gas and aerosol scenarios are used to analyze the role of aerosols in climate feedbacks and their spread across initial condition ensembles of transient climate simulations. The standard deviation of global feedback parameters across ensemble members is low, typically 0.02 W m(-2) K-1. Feedbacks from high (8.5 W m(-2)) and moderate (4.5 W m(-2)) year 2100 forcing cases are nearly identical. An aerosol kernel is introduced to remove effects of aerosol cloud interactions that alias into cloud feedbacks. Adjusted cloud feedbacks indicate an aerosol feedback resulting from changes to climate that increase sea-salt emissions, mostly in the Southern Ocean. Ensemble simulations also indicate higher tropical cloud feedbacks with higher aerosol loading. These effects contribute to a difference in cloud feedbacks of nearly 50% between ensembles of the same model. These two effects are also seen in aquaplanet simulations with varying fixed drop number. Thus aerosols can be a significant modifier of cloud feedbacks, and different representations of aerosols and their interactions with clouds may contribute to multimodel spread in climate feedbacks and climate sensitivity in multimodel archives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available