3.8 Article

Understanding the impact of Green supply chain management practices on operational competitive capabilities

Journal

TQM JOURNAL
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 796-815

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/TQM-08-2021-0246

Keywords

Green supply chain management (GSCM); Internal environment management (IEM); Green purchasing (GP); Operational competitive capabilities (OCC); Market performance (MP)

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research aims to investigate the impact of green supply chain practices (GSCPs) on competitive operational capabilities and market performance. The findings suggest a positive relationship between GSCPs and all competitive operational capabilities, as well as a direct relationship between operational capabilities and market performance. This study contributes to the relatively unexplored area of GSCPs in developing countries and adds value to the emerging literature in this field.
Purpose The purpose of this research is twofold: first, to investigate the impact of the adoption of green supply chain practices (GSCPs) on various parameters of competitive operational capabilities; second, to investigate the parameters that influence the market performance. Design/methodology/approach Structural equation modeling analysis was done based on the collected data through a self-administrated questionnaire from managers of 120 manufacturing firms. Findings In this study, we suggest that the relationship of GSCPs is positively related to all competitive operational capabilities. Further, we recommend that operational capabilities are directly related to market performance. Originality/value This paper investigates the relationship between GSCPs, Operational Competitive Capabilities and market performance, a relatively unexplored area in the developing economy. Moreover, it also adds value to the nascent literature on GSCPs in developing countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available