Journal
PHILOSOPHY COMPASS
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages -Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12822
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- H2020 European Research Council [851145]
- European Research Council (ERC) [851145] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article discusses the controversies surrounding sentience in fish and invertebrates and presents two ways of responding to the challenges. In a policy-making context, precautionary thinking can help in treating animals appropriately despite uncertainties about their sentience. In a scientific context, inspiration can be drawn from the science of human consciousness to distinguish between conscious and unconscious perception in animals.
'Sentience' sometimes refers to the capacity for any type of subjective experience, and sometimes to the capacity to have subjective experiences with a positive or negative valence, such as pain or pleasure. We review recent controversies regarding sentience in fish and invertebrates and consider the deep methodological challenge posed by these cases. We then present two ways of responding to the challenge. In a policy-making context, precautionary thinking can help us treat animals appropriately despite continuing uncertainty about their sentience. In a scientific context, we can draw inspiration from the science of human consciousness to disentangle conscious and unconscious perception (especially vision) in animals. Developing better ways to disentangle conscious and unconscious affect is a key priority for future research.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available