4.7 Review

Cleaner energy planning, managethent and technologies: Perspectives of supply-demand side and end-of-pipe management

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 1-13

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.181

Keywords

Cleaner energy; Supply side; Demand side; Management; CO2; Modelling; Planning

Funding

  1. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia [Q.J130000.2409.03G40]
  2. Faculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pazmany Peter Catholic University (PPKE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Energy is needed in all sectors: industrial, domestic, commercial, transportation, power generation. Fossil fuel has been the main source of energy since decades. Due to rising greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions, the energy mix in many countries are shifting towards alternative energy sources, such as renewable energy and nuclear. At the same time, energy demands should also be managed and minimised to curb the rising GHG. Transitioning towards cleaner energy supply may also take time due to economic, political, technology readiness and public acceptance reason. A faster solution is to sequestrate CO2 especially through CO2 capture, utilisation and storage technologies. This paper presents an overview of the Journal of Cleaner Production Special Volume for the 18th conference Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation for Energy Saving and Pollution Reduction (PRES 2015). The paper discussed issues, methods and solutions to achieve cleaner energy. The review has been written from the perspective of the supply side management, demand side management or end-of pipe management. The content of the Special Volume also includes cleaner energy planning, policies and education. The Special Volume reviews various ideas and discussion from authors all over the world and also provides some directions for future studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available