4.7 Article

Mitigating construction dust pollution: state of the art and the way forward

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages 1658-1666

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.015

Keywords

Construction dust; Air pollution; Mitigation; China

Funding

  1. CIB Sebestyen Future Leaders Award
  2. National Natural Science Fund [71303203]
  3. College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, City University of Hong Kong [9610315]
  4. City University of Hong Kong [7004309, 7200376]
  5. Mainland NSFC project by City University of Hong Kong [9680114]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Along with China's modern industrialization, challenges on smog crisis are raising dramatically in the past decade. The sources of municipal smog are multiple and complex, one of which is construction dust emission due to the rapid urbanization. In literature, there are studies focusing on the end-pipe treatment of construction dust; however, very little research has been conducted from the perspective of dust mitigation in developing countries. To fill in this research gap, this paper investigates the current situation of construction dust prevention and control in China, with the aim of providing insights for mitigating dust pollution caused by the construction industry. Through a combination of the content analysis, on-site observation, questionnaire survey and interviews with experienced professionals, a total of 11 related regulations are thoroughly reviewed, and the main sources of construction dust production are identified. A case study is further presented to demonstrate the prevailing dust control measures on site. Recommendations are proposed in order to increase the awareness of related stakeholders, including formulation of targeted regulations, establishment of an appropriate charging scheme, development of a feasible monitoring system, and enhancement of training and dissemination. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available