4.7 Review

Assessment of emerging energy-efficiency technologies for the pulp and paper industry: a technical review

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages 5-28

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.116

Keywords

Emerging energy-efficiency technology; Energy saving; CO2 emissions; Pulp and paper industry

Funding

  1. China Sustainable Energy Program of the Energy Foundation
  2. Dow Chemical Company (through a charitable contribution) through the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, South China University of Technology [201422]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pulp and paper industry accounts for approximately 5% of total industrial energy consumption and contributes 2% of direct carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from industries. World paper and paperboard demand and production are increasing significantly, leading to an increase in this sector's energy use and CO2 emissions. Although current studies identify a wide range of energy-efficiency technologies that have already been commercialized for the pulp and paper industry, information is limited or scattered regarding new energy-efficiency technologies that are not yet fully commercialized. Development of emerging or advanced energy-efficiency technologies and their deployment in the market will be crucial for this industry's mid- and long-term energy saving and climate change mitigation strategies. This paper compiles available information on energy savings, environmental and other benefits, costs, and commercialization status for 25 emerging technologies to reduce the energy use and CO2 emissions. The purpose is to provide a well-structured comprehensive review on these emerging energy-efficiency technologies for engineers, researchers, investors, policy makers, pulp and/or paper companies, and other interested parties. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available