4.7 Article

Comparative global warming potential assessment of eight microcrystalline cellulose manufacturing systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 620-629

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.091

Keywords

Global warming potential; Microcrystalline cellulose; Chemical pulp mill; Chemical pulp; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life cycle assessment

Funding

  1. TEKES - the Finnish Funding Agency for innovation [40332/12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we conducted a comparative global warming potential assessment of eight microcrystalline cellulose manufacturing systems using life cycle assessment software and global warming potential (GWP) as a measure of environmental burden. The studied systems included both non-integrated (stand-alone system) and integrated (located within the chemical pulp mill) manufacturing systems. The results indicate that the Non-integrated AaltoCell (TM) system has lower GWP than the Non-integrated market MCC systems as well as slightly lower GWP than the AaltoCell (TM) plant integrated to chemical pulp mill systems. However, the lowest GWP was produced by the AaltoCell (TM) plant integrated to chemical pulp mill due to use of unbleached pulp as a raw material. Our results indicate that the relative shares of chemical pulp, heat, ammonia and electricity processes contribute to a very large share of the GWP results. Chemical pulp has the biggest influence on GWP results, but it is also the main raw material. Comparison of manufacturing without chemical pulp production indicates that heat energy and ammonia have the biggest impacts. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available