4.7 Article

Characterizing the environmental implications of the recycling of non-metallic fractions from waste printed circuit boards

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 137, Issue -, Pages 546-554

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.131

Keywords

E-waste; Non-metallic fractions; Quantity; Heavy metals; POPS

Funding

  1. 'Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China' from Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2014DFM90170]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of Introduced High Talent Financial Subsidies of Shenzhen University [000044]
  3. NSFC [21507090]
  4. Huoyingdong Education Fund [151079]
  5. Shanghai Cooperative Centre for WEEE Recycling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-metallic fractions (NMFs), which make up almost three fourths (by weight) of waste printed circuit boards, have become a matter of great concern for e-waste recyclers, because most of them contain hazardous substances with low utilization value. This study used an advanced Sales Obsolescence Model approach to quantify the generation and flows of non-metallic fractions in China, and to examine the potential environmental impacts associated with both the fractions themselves, and their end-of-life processing activities: disposal into landfills or incineration, and recycling via physical or chemical methods. The results show that approximately 201,000 tons (one time standard deviation: 67,000) of scrap non-metallic fractions were expected to be generated in 2015, and that this amount could increase to 279,000 tons by 2020. Both our own analysis and a systematic review of existing studies on the hazardous characterization of printed circuit boards waste, non-metallic fractions, and their recycling and disposal activities, indicate the threat of environmental pollution, from heavy metals, brominated flame retardants and secondary persistent organic pollutants, particularly dioxins. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available