4.7 Article

How to walk the talk? Developing actions for sustainability in academic research

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 137, Issue -, Pages 83-92

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.010

Keywords

Sustainability; Academic research; Workshop; Sustainability science

Funding

  1. Belgian National Research Foundation (FRS-FNRS)
  2. Flemish Inter-University Research Council (VLIR-UOS) [1220215F]
  3. Flemish Government's Department of Environment AMP
  4. Energy's 'Ecocampus' program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sustainability in higher education is a growing field of reflection and practice, yet integrating sustain ability and academic research (as a distinct pillar of academia - next to education, societal service and campus operations) is still considered a challenge. This study: i. Proposes a conceptualization of sustainability in academic research based on an explorative literature review; ii. Suggests a range of actions fostering sustainability in academic research based on an expert-based workshop; and iii. Critically reflects on a case study entailing a university-wide sustainability transition initiative. The proposed conceptualization of sustainability in academic research is shaped by the diversity of perspectives in the scientific literature and focuses on the degree of disciplinary integration within and outside academia. Actions to foster sustainability in academic research include actions with regard to: i. Research funding; ii. Research & career evaluation; iii. Research organization; iv. Capacity building and v. policy. The emerging range of possible actions as designed by research managers as well as the early experience of individual higher education institutions in experimenting with sustainability in academic research contribute to the translation of sustainability into a range of tangible and realistic research actions for higher education institutions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available