3.8 Article

Effect of ring and rotor spun yarns on denim fabric properties

Journal

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/RJTA-11-2021-0137

Keywords

Ring-spun yarn; Open-end rotor yarn; Denim fabric; Mechanical properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the mechanical properties of denim fabrics made from ring-spun and open-end rotor spun yarns. The results show that denim made from ring-spun yarns has better tensile and tear strength, while denim made from open-end rotor yarns has better abrasion resistance, pilling resistance, and air permeability.
Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the mechanical properties of denim fabrics constructed from ring-spun and open-end rotor spun yarns. Design/methodology/approach Yarns of 10s Ne count using cotton fibers were spun using the ring and open-end rotor spinning technologies. The yarns were used to produce a denim fabric on an air-jet loom with a 3/1 twill weave structure. Mechanical tests - tensile strength, tear strength, abrasion resistance and pilling resistance - of denim fabrics were evaluated. The test results were analyzed using analysis of variance with the help of Software Package for Social Sciences. Findings Denim fabrics made by using ring-spun yarns exhibited better tensile and tear strength properties than denim fabrics made by using open-end rotor spun yarns. On the contrary, denim produced using open-end rotor yarns have better abrasion resistance, pilling resistance and air permeability than those produced using ring-spun yarns. Originality/value Both spinning techniques have a significant influence on the properties of denim fabrics. Whenever better tensile and tear strength is required, it is better to use ring-spun yarns, while if the requirement is better abrasion resistance and pilling resistance with high air permeability, then open-end rotor spun yarns shall be used.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available