Journal
CHAUCER REVIEW
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 273-301Publisher
PENN STATE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.5325/chaucerrev.57.3.0273
Keywords
Chaucer apocrypha; Frederick J. Furnivall; Henry Bradshaw; Romaunt of the Rose; Tale of Gamelyn; Walter W. Skeat
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article explores the development of tests for the authenticity of works attributed to Chaucer by Cambridge University librarian Henry Bradshaw. It examines Bradshaw's application of these tests to two disputed works and uses digital humanities methods to analyze his data. The article also discusses how Walter W. Skeat's use of Bradshaw's rhyme tests in the Clarendon edition resulted in different conclusions due to a misunderstanding of their purpose and intended relationship to manuscript evidence.
This article explores Cambridge University librarian Henry Bradshaw's development of tests for the authenticity of works attributed to Chaucer and his application of these principles to two disputed works: the Middle English Romaunt of the Rose and the Tale of Gamelyn. It makes use of unpublished archival papers and reconsiders historical editorial approaches using methods from the digital humanities to display and analyze Bradshaw's data. After establishing the nature of these rhyme tests and the context of their development, I consider their later use by Walter W. Skeat in the Clarendon edition. I argue that Skeat reached conclusions different from those of Bradshaw because he misunderstood the purpose of Bradshaw's rhyme tests and their intended relationship to manuscript evidence. This realization has implications for contemporary Chaucer scholarship, which builds upon Skeat's textual work in the Oxford and Riverside editions.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available