3.8 Article

Rolling Bearing Damage Evaluation by the Dynamic Process From Self-Induced Resonance to System Resonance of a Duffing System

Publisher

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4054694

Keywords

self-induced resonance; system resonance; Duffing system; damage evaluation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper studies the dynamic response of a Duffing system from self-induced resonance to system resonance. Numerical simulation shows that the system response gradually transitions from self-induced resonance to system resonance with the increase of the pulse amplitude of the signal. To describe this process, the quality factor of the system response is defined. A novel method is developed to evaluate the severity of rolling bearing early damage based on the evolution from self-induced resonance to system resonance.
The dynamic response of a Duffing system from self-induced resonance to system resonance is studied in this paper. From numerical simulation, it is found that the system response gradually transits from self-induced resonance to system resonance with the increase of the pulse amplitude of the signal. In order to describe this process, we define the quality factor of the system response. With the evolution from self-induced resonance to system resonance, the quality factor gradually increases from 0 to 1. Then, based on the evolution, a novel method is developed to evaluate the severity of rolling bearing early damage. The results show that the method can be used not only to describe the process of a rolling bearing from healthy to damaged, but also to evaluate the severity of the early damage of a rolling bearing. The quality factor is a key index to reflect the severity of a rolling bearing. In addition, the sensitivity of the quality factor is superior to other traditional indices formerly used in the early damage evaluation. The effective method gives a new way for rolling bearing early damage evaluation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available