4.5 Article

Combination of counter current salting-out homogenous liquid-liquid extraction and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction as a novel microextraction of drugs in urine samples

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.01.031

Keywords

Counter current salting-out homogenous; liquid-liquid extraction; Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Amphetamines; Urine analysis

Funding

  1. Deputy of Research and Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran [94119]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The counter current salting-out homogenous liquid-liquid extraction (CCSHLLE) joined with the dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop (DLLME-SFO) has been developed as a high preconcentration technique for the determination of different drugs in urine samples. Amphetamines were employed as model compounds to assess the extraction procedure and were determined by high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV). In this method, initially, NaCI as a separation reagent is filled into a small column and a mixture of urine and acetonitrile is passed through the column. By passing the mixture, NaCl is dissolved and the fine droplets of acetonitrile are formed due to salting-out effect. The produced droplets go up through the remained mixture and collect as a separated layer. Then, the collected acetonitrile is removed with a syringe and mixed with 30.0 mu L 1-undecanol (extraction solvent). In the second step, the 5.00 mLK(2)CO(3) solution (2% w/v) is rapidly injected into the above mixture placed in a,test tube for further DLLME-SFO. Under the optimum conditions, calibration curves are linear in the range of 1-3000 mu g L-1 and limit of detections (LODs) are in the range of 0.5-2 mu g L-.(-1) The extraction recoveries and enrichment factors ranged from 78 to 84% and 157 to 168, respectively. Repeatability (intra-day) and reproducibility (inter-day) of method based on seven replicate measurements of 100 mu g L-1 of amphetamines were in the range of 3.5-4.5% and 4-5%, respectively. The method was successfully applied for the determination of amphetamines in the actual urine samples. The relative recoveries of urine samples spiked with amphetamine and methamphetamine are 90-108%. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available