4.5 Article

A validated simultaneous quantification method for vonoprazan (TAK-438F) and its 4 metabolites in human plasma by the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.01.051

Keywords

Vonoprazan (TAK-438F); Bioanalytical method validation (BMV); Simultaneous quantification; LC/MS/MS; Regulated bioanalysis; Human plasma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vonoprazan fumarate (TAK-438) is a potassium-competitive acid blocker which was approved in Japan for a treatment of acid-related diseases. In this study a simple and validated bioanalytical method, which can simultaneously determine vonoprazan (TAK-438F) and its four metabolites (M-I, M-II, M-III and M-IV-Sul) in human plasma, was developed. The method is based on protein precipitation and subsequent ultra-high performance liquid chromatography separation followed by tandem mass spectrometry detection. The mass spectrometric parameters for detection of TAK-438F, M-I, M-III and M-IV-Sul were modified from their optimum values in order to achieve a simultaneous quantification while retaining enough sensitivity and wide dynamic ranges for all the target analytes. The validity and robustness of the method was verified through a validation study as per the regulatory guidance on bioanalytical method validation. The calibration ranges are 0.1-100 ng/mL for TAK-438F and and 1-1000 ng/mL for M-I, M-II and M-IV-Sul using the 100 mu L of human plasma. The total run time per sample is 5 min. The working solution for M-III was recommended to be prepared separately, especially for the long-term use, in order to avoid the instability of M-III in the mixed working solutions, which could cause the high consumption of reference standards. The established method was applied to clinical pharmacokinetic studies and concentrations of all the analytes in human plasma were successfully determined with high reproducibility ensured by incurred sample reanalysis, indicating the suitableness of the established method. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available