3.8 Article

Metamodel-based metaheuristics in optimal responsive adaptation and recovery of traffic networks

Journal

SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 756-774

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23789689.2022.2029325

Keywords

Resilience; System recovery; System adaptation; Metamodeling; Decision-making; System analysis

Funding

  1. European territorial cooperation programme 'Interreg V B Atlantic Area' [EAPA_45/2018-AA-FLOODS Project]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the application of metamodels in recovery and adaptation modeling and proposes a sequential global metamodeling technique. The results show that metamodeling-based metaheuristics enable fast engineering analysis of traffic recovery and adaptation, which may change the way decisions are made.
Different emerging threats highlighted the relevance of recovery and adaptation modelling in the functioning of societal systems. However, as modelling of systems becomes more complex, its effort increases challenging the practicality of the engineering analyses required for efficient recovery and adaptation. In the present work, metamodels are researched as a tool to enable these analyses in traffic networks. One of the main advantages of metamodeling is their synergy with the short decision times required in recovery and adaptation. A sequential global metamodeling technique is proposed and applied to three macroscopic day-to-day user-equilibrium models. Two reference contexts of application are researched: optimal recovery to a perturbation (with response times reduced by 98% with loss of accuracy lower than 1%) and adaptation under uncertainty with perturbation-dependent optimality. Results show that metamodeling-based metaheuristics enable fast resource-intensive engineering analyses of traffic recovery and adaptation, which may change the paradigm of decision-making in this field

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available