4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Glycoform analysis of alpha1-acid glycoprotein by capillary electrophoresis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1475, Issue -, Pages 102-109

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.11.014

Keywords

Alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein; Capillary electrophoresis; Glycoform analysis; Glycoproteins; Capillary coating; Charge ladder

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM044931] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A relatively fast and reproducible CE separation was developed for the glycoform analysis of alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein (AGP). Factors that were considered included the pH for this separation and various techniques for coating the capillary and/or to minimize electroosmotic flow and protein adsorption. Optimum resolution of the AGP glycoforms was obtained at pH 4.2 with a running buffer containing 0.1% Brij 35 and by using static and dynamic coatings of PEO on the capillary. These conditions made it possible to separate nine AGP glycoform bands in about 20 min. The limit of detection (based on absorbance measurements) ranged from 0.09 to 0.38 mu M for these AGP glycoform bands, and the linear range extended up to a total AGP concentration of at least 240 mu M. The migration times for the glycoform bands had typical within day and day-to-day precisions of +/- 0.16-0.23% or less, respectively, on a single treated capillary and the variation between capillaries was +/- 0.56% or less. A charge ladder approach was employed to examine the mass or charge differences in the glycoforms that made up these bands, giving a good fit to a model in which the neighboring bands differed by one charge (e.g., from a sialic acid residue) and had an average mass difference of approximately 0.7-0.9 kDa. The approaches used to develop this separation method are not limited to AGP but could be extended to the analysis of other glycoproteins by CE. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available