4.2 Article

Promoting learner autonomy and improving reflective thinking skills through reflective practice and collaborative learning

Journal

INNOVATION IN LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 364-379

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2022.2047694

Keywords

Learner autonomy; reflective thinking skills; collaborative learning; EAP; online learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the role of reflective practice and collaborative learning practice in promoting learner autonomy and improving reflective thinking skills and related learner perceptions. The results show no significant difference in learner autonomy and reflective thinking skills in quantitative data analysis, but there is a significant change in learner autonomy from qualitative data analysis. The qualitative findings from student interviews support these results.
In this study, the role of reflective practice and collaborative learning practice in promoting learner autonomy (LA) and improving reflective thinking skills (RT) and related learner perceptions were explored. A mixed-method design was preferred to investigate the issue, with participants enrolled in an Academic English Skills (EAP) course (N= 41). Quantitative data analysis of pre- and post-test scores of Learner Autonomy Scale (LAS) and Reflective Thinking Scale (RTS) detected no statistically significant difference in participants' learner autonomy and reflective thinking skills. However, the results of Change in Learner Autonomy Scale (CLARTS) demonstrated a statistically significant change in LA and RT. Finally, the qualitative findings obtained from student interviews supported the results of CLARTS and revealed positive attitudes of learners towards reflective practice and collaborative practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available