3.8 Review

A review of sludge production in South Africa municipal wastewater treatment plants, analysis of handling cost and potential minimization methods

Journal

PHYSICAL SCIENCES REVIEWS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/psr-2021-0234

Keywords

anaerobic side stream reactor (ASSR); oxic-settling-anaerobic process; SANI (R) technology; sludge minimization techniques; waste activated sludge

Funding

  1. Water Research Commission South Africa [C2019/2020-00154]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines sludge production potential and handling costs in selected regions of South Africa, as well as potential methods for sludge minimization.
The government of South Africa through the department of water and sanitation has installed numerous activated sludge systems in most of the municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWWTPs) to ensure adequate sanitation. However, secondary sludge generation and handling is a major challenge of the AS process. This work reviews the sludge production potential in selected regions in South Africa including Midvaal, Emfuleni and Lesedi municipalities. Further, the sludge handling cost and potential methods of sludge minimization are discussed. This study found that the selected MWWTPs discharge effluent volume of between 3 and 65 ML/day with average COD of about 350 mg/L leading to sludge production of between 5 and 23 tons/day with an estimated handling cost of (sic)57,000 to (sic)320,000 per year. Some of the technologies reviewed for sludge minimization to cut down plant operation cost include chemical oxidation using ozone and potassium ferrate (K2FeO4), application of oxic-settling-anaerobic (OSA) process, anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (AAO) combined with K2FeO4 oxidation side stream reactor (SSR), SANI (R) technology and use of anaerobic side stream reactor (ASSR) in the conventional activated sludge (AS) line.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available