Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation
Davide Chicco et al.
BMC GENOMICS (2020)
Prevalence of kidney stones in the USA: The National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey
Zhaoyi Chen et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY (2019)
A Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Algorithm for Assessing Stone-Free Status after Single Session Shock Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Ureteral Stones
Min Soo Choo et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2018)
Machine learning to identify multigland disease in primary hyperparathyroidism
Joseph R. Imbus et al.
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH (2017)
A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones
G. Bozzini et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2017)
Evaluation of Hounsfield Units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition
Takehiko Nakasato et al.
UROLITHIASIS (2015)
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones
Attasit Srisubat et al.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2014)
Kidney Stone Size and Hounsfield Units Predict Successful Shockwave Lithotripsy in Children
Ahmed El-Assmy et al.
UROLOGY (2013)
Outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary-tract stones: A large-scale study at a single institution
T Abe et al.
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY (2005)
Online ensemble learning: An empirical study
A Fern et al.
MACHINE LEARNING (2003)
Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994
KK Stamatelou et al.
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL (2003)
Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting
J Friedman et al.
ANNALS OF STATISTICS (2000)
Share Paper
