Journal
PSYCH JOURNAL
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 741-747Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pchj.556
Keywords
aesthetic judgments; biological beauty; neuroaesthetics; mathematical beauty
Categories
Funding
- Leverhulme Trust, London [RPG-2017-341]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigates the resistance to revision of judgments of mathematical beauty to external opinion and finds that such judgments have a high level of resistance.
We here address the question of the extent to which judgments of mathematical beauty (which we categorize as biological beauty) are resistant to revision through external opinion. A total of 100 mathematicians of different national and ethnic origins were asked to rate 60 mathematical equations for their beauty; after being presented a fictitious expert rating, they were asked to re-rate the same equations. Results showed that the judgments of mathematical beauty had a high level of resistance to external opinion. This is in line with the resistance to revision of a judgments for other categories of biological beauty.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available