3.8 Article

The intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell (ipRGC) mediated pupil response in young adult humans with refractive errors

Journal

JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 112-121

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.12.001

Keywords

Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells; Pupil; Melanopsin; Refractive error; Myopia

Categories

Funding

  1. Flinders University College of Nursing and Health Sciences Establishment Grant [01.529.41820]
  2. Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study measured the post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) in young adults with different refractive errors using a custom-made optical system. The results showed that refractive error did not have an effect on PIPR, but there was a significant impact of different wavelengths of light stimulation on PIPR.
Purpose: The intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) signal environmental light, with axons projected to the midbrain that control pupil size and circadian rhythms. Post-illumination pupil response (PIPR), a sustained pupil constriction after short-wavelength light stimulation, is an indirect measure of ipRGC activity. Here, we measured the PIPR in young adults with various refractive errors using a custom-made optical system. Methods: PIPR was measured on myopic (-3.50 +/- 1.82 D, n = 20) and non-myopic (+0.28 +/- 0.23 D, n = 19) participants (mean age, 23.36 +/- 3.06 years). The right eye was dilated and presented with long-wavelength (red, 625 nm, 3.68 x 10(14) photons/cm2/s) and short-wavelength (blue, 470 nm, 3.24 x 10(14) photons/cm(2)/s) 1 s and 5 s pulses of light, and the consensual response was measured in the left eye for 60 s following light offset. The 6 s and 30 s PIPR and early and late area under the curve (AUC) for 1 and 5 s stimuli were calculated. Results: For most subjects, the 6 s and 30 s PIPR were significantly lower (p < 0.001), and the early and late AUC were significantly larger for 1 s blue light compared to red light (p < 0.001), suggesting a strong ipRGC response. The 5 s blue stimulation induced a slightly stronger melanopsin response, compared to 1 s stimulation with the same wavelength. However, none of the PIPR metrics were different between myopes and non-myopes for either stimulus duration (p > 0.05). Conclusions: We confirm previous research that there is no effect of refractive error on the PIPR. (c) 2020 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available