3.8 Article

Cortical Features in Child and Adolescent Carriers of Mutant Huntingtin (mHTT)

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUNTINGTONS DISEASE
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 173-178

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JHD-210512

Keywords

Huntington's disease; cortical development; children at risk for HD; magnetic resonance imaging; trinucleotide repeat disorder

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01 NS055903]
  2. CHDI Foundation [071108]
  3. National Institutes of Health [1S10OD025025-01]
  4. CHDI Foundation
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  7. University College of London

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that while striatal development differs significantly in carriers of mutant huntingtin, cortical development appears to be grossly normal among child and adolescent carriers of mHTT.
Background: Molecular studies provide evidence that mutant huntingtin (mHTT) affects early cortical development; however, cortical development has not been evaluated in child and adolescent carriers of mHTT. Objective: To evaluate the impact of mHTT on the developmental trajectories of cortical thickness and surface area. Methods: Children and adolescents (6-18 years) participated in the KidsHD study. mHTT carrier status was determined for research purposes only to classify participants as gene expanded (GE) and gene non-expanded (GNE). Cortical features were extracted from 3T neuroimaging using FreeSurfer. Nonlinear mixed effects models were conducted to determine if age, group, and CAG repeat were associated with cortical morphometry. Results: Age-related changes in cortical morphometry were similar across groups. Expanded CAG repeat was not significantly associated with cortical features. Conclusion: While striatal development is markedly different in GE and GNE, developmental change of the cortex appears grossly normal among child and adolescent carrier of mHTT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available