4.7 Article

Structural Diversity of Ligand-Binding Androgen Receptors Revealed by Microsecond Long Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Enhanced Sampling

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages 4611-4619

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00424

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21403291, 21575128]
  2. National Major Basic Research Program of China [2016YFA0501701, 2016YFB0201700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Androgen receptor (AR) plays important roles in the development of prostate cancer (PCa). The antagonistic drugs, which suppress the activity of AR, are widely used in the treatment of PCa. However, the molecular mechanism of antagonism about how ligands affect the structures OAR remains elusive. To better understand the conformational variability of ARs bound with agonists or antagonists, we performed long time unbiased molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and enhancect sampling simulations for the ligand binding domain of AR (AR-LBD) in complex with various ligands. Based on the simulation results, we proposed an allosteric pathivay linking ligands and helix 12 (H12) of AR-LBD, which involves the interactions among the ligands and the residues W741, H874, and 1899. The interaction pathway provides 'an atpmistic explanation of how ligands affect the structure of AR-LBD. A repositioning of H12 was observed, but it is facilitated by the C-terminal of H12, instead of by the loop between helix 11 (H11) and H12. The bias-exchange metadynainics simulations further deinonstrated the above observations. More importantly, the free energy profiles constructed by the enhanced sampling simulations revealed the transition:, process, between the antagonistic form arid agonistic form of AR-LBD. Our results would be helpful for the design of snore : efficient antagonists of AR to combat PCa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available