4.7 Article

Introducing QMC/MMpol: Quantum Monte Carlo in Polarizable Force Fields for Excited States

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 1674-1683

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00044

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ECHO grants of The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [712.012.005, 12.011.005]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [EnLight-277755]
  3. University of Pisa [PRA_2016_46]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present for the first time a quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics scheme which combines quantum Monte Carlo with the reaction field of classical polarizable dipoles (QMC/MMpol). In our approach, the self-consistently generated at the variational Monte Carlo level and then used to include environmental effects in diffusion Monte Carlo. We investigate the performance of this hybrid model in describing the vertical excitation energies of prototypical small molecules solvated in water, namely, methylenecyclopropene and s-trans acrolein. Two polarization regimes are explored where either the dipoles are optimized with respect to the ground-state solute density (polGS) or different sets of dipoles are separately brought to equilibrium with the states involved in the electronic transition (polSS). By comparing with reference supermolecular calculations where both solute and solvent are treated quantum mechanically, we find that the inclusion of the response of the environment to the excitation of the solute leads to superior results than the use of a frozen environment (point charges or polGS), in particular, when the solute-solvent coupling is dominated by electrostatic effects which are well recovered in the polSS condition. QMC/MMpol represents therefore a robust scheme to treat important environmental effects beyond static point charges, combining the accuracy of QMC with the simplicity of a classical approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available