3.8 Article

From Generative Models to Generative Passages: A Computational Approach to (Neuro) Phenomenology

Journal

REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 829-857

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13164-021-00604-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada [756-2020-0704]
  2. Dr. Mortimer and Theresa Sackler Foundation
  3. NWO Research Talent Grant of the Dutch Government [406.18.535]
  4. French National Research Agency [ANR-17-CE40-0005-02]
  5. William K. Warren Foundation
  6. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P20GM121312]
  7. Institute for Data Valorization (IVADO) Professor Startup & Operational Funds
  8. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec (FRSQ)
  9. European Research Council grant [617739-BRAINandMINDFULNESS]
  10. Wellcome Trust [088130/Z/09/Z]
  11. Australian Laureate Fellowship project A Philosophy of Medicine for the 21st Century [FL170100160]
  12. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) [752-2019-0065]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a version of neurophenomenology that utilizes computational modeling techniques based on generative modeling in neuroscience and biology. The approach, known as computational phenomenology, applies methods from computational modeling to create a formal model of descriptions of lived experience in philosophy. The paper provides an overview of the naturalization of phenomenology project, evaluates philosophical objections, and presents their approach in detail.
This paper presents a version of neurophenomenology based on generative modelling techniques developed in computational neuroscience and biology. Our approach can be described as computational phenomenology because it applies methods originally developed in computational modelling to provide a formal model of the descriptions of lived experience in the phenomenological tradition of philosophy (e.g., the work of Edmund Husserl, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, etc.). The first section presents a brief review of the overall project to naturalize phenomenology. The second section presents and evaluates philosophical objections to that project and situates our version of computational phenomenology with respect to these projects. The third section reviews the generative modelling framework. The final section presents our approach in detail. We conclude by discussing how our approach differs from previous attempts to use generative modelling to help understand consciousness. In summary, we describe a version of computational phenomenology which uses generative modelling to construct a computational model of the inferential or interpretive processes that best explain this or that kind of lived experience.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available