4.0 Article

Numerical study of seabed response and liquefaction around a jacket support offshore wind turbine foundation under combined wave and current loading

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 78-88

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.wse.2021.12.007

Keywords

Jacket; Wave and current; Liquefaction; Seafloor dynamic; Fluid-seabed-structure interactions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used numerical simulation to analyze the process of seabed liquefaction under wave-current conditions. It was found that in the absence of current, the depth and range of the liquefaction area around the foundation increased and then decreased as the wave propagated. Under current conditions, the liquefaction depth was greater. Additionally, the study found that downstream piles were more prone to liquefaction than upstream piles in the presence of forward current.
The seabed instability induced by the transient liquefaction when exposed to wave-current may threaten the safety of offshore structures. In this study, the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations with the k-epsilon turbulence model were used to imitate the fluid dynamics, and Biot's poro-elastic theory was used to simulate the transient seabed response. An in-house solver (porous-fluid-seabed-structure interactions-field operation and manipulation) integrating the flow model and seabed model with the finite volume method was developed. The present model was confirmed with published experimental results and then used to analyze the dynamic process of the fluid-seabed-structure interactions as well as seafloor liquefaction around the jacket foundation under wave-current loading. The simulated results showed that the depth and range for the liquefaction area around the jacket foundation tended to increase at first and then declined as the wave propagated forward in the absence of current. In addition, the results demonstrated that the liquefaction depth under current and wave in the same orientation was greater than that without current. It is worth mentioning that the downstream piles were more prone to liquefaction than the upstream piles when the forward current existed. (C) 2021 Hohai University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available