4.6 Article

Economic growth, environmental regulations, energy use, and ecological footprint linkage in the Next-11 countries: Implications for environmental sustainability

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 1327-1347

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0958305X221084293

Keywords

Environmental regulations; ecological footprint; trade; economic growth; energy consumption; AMG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The activities of humans on Earth have led to a global concern for climate change, ecological distortions, and environmental deterioration. The efficacy of environmental regulations in emerging economies remains uncertain. Economic growth, trade, and energy consumption contribute to environmental deterioration.
The activities of humans on Earth have increased the global concern for climate change, ecological distortions, and environmental deterioration. These concerns have warranted regulations that relate to environmental preservation and sustainability. However, the efficiency of such regulations in emerging economies is yet to be ascertained as conclusions from various findings still remain murky. We explore how environmental regulations affects ecological footprint (EFP) using the cross-sectionally augmented autoregressive distributed lag (CS-ARDL) model, augmented mean group (AMG), and the common correlated effects mean group estimators (CCEMG) in the eleven fastest emerging economies (N11). The findings reveal that environmental regulations are not efficient in abating environmental deterioration. Economic growth, trade, and energy consumption invigorate the EFP. The country-specific findings confirm that energy consumption and economic growth promote environmental degradation in all the N11 countries, and the outcome was consistent across all estimators. Finally, policy directions are discussed along with the limitations of the study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available