Race, power, and policy: understanding state anti-eviction policies during COVID-19

In the United States, striking racial disparities in COVID-19 infection and mortality rates were one of the core patterns of the virus. These racial disproportionalities were a result of structural factors-laws, rules, and practices embedded in economic, social, and political systems. Public policy is central among such structural features. Policies distribute advantages, disadvantages, benefits, and burdens in ways that generate, reinforce, or redress racial inequities. Crucially, public policy is a function of power relations, so understanding policy decisions requires attentiveness to power. This paper asseses statistical associations between racial power and state anti-eviction policies. Charting the timing of state policy responses between March 2020 and June 2021, I examine correlations between response times and racial power as reflected in state populations, voting constituencies, legislatures, and social movement activities. Ultimately, I do not find any significant associations. The null results underscore the complexities and difficulties of studying race, power, and public policy with theoretical nuance and empirical care. While the findings leave us with much to learn about how racial power operates, the conceptualization and theorizing offered in the paper, instructively underscore the value of centering racial power in analyses of public policy.

Automated summary

The paper examines the statistical associations between racial power and state anti-eviction policies in the United States. By analyzing the timing of state policy responses from March 2020 to June 2021, the study explores correlations between response times and racial power factors such as state populations, voting constituencies, legislatures, and social movement activities. The null results highlight the complexities and difficulties of studying race, power, and public policy, but emphasize the importance of centering racial power in policy analyses.