4.7 Article

On the errors of local density (LDA) and generalized gradient (GGA) approximations to the Kohn-Sham potential and orbital energies

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 144, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4950877

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In spite of the high quality of exchange-correlation energies E-xc obtained with the generalized gradient approximations (GGAs) of density functional theory, their xc potentials v(xc) are strongly deficient, yielding upshifts of ca. 5 eV in the orbital energy spectrum (in the order of 50% of highlying valence orbital energies). The GGAs share this deficiency with the local density approximation (LDA). We argue that this error is not caused by the incorrect long-range asymptotics of v(xc) or by self-interaction error. It arises from incorrect density dependencies of LDA and GGA exchange functionals leading to incorrect (too repulsive) functional derivatives (i.e., response parts of the potentials). The v(xc) potential is partitioned into the potential of the xc hole v(xchole) (twice the xc energy density epsilon(xc)), which determines E-xc, and the response potential v(resp), which does not contribute to E-xc explicitly. The substantial upshift of LDA/GGA orbital energies is due to a too repulsive LDA exchange response potential v(xresp)(LDA) in the bulk region. Retaining the LDA exchange hole potential plus the B88 gradient correction to it but replacing the response parts of these potentials by the model orbital-dependent response potential v(xresp)(GLLB) of Gritsenko et al. [Phys. Rev. A 51, 1944 (1995)], which has the proper step-wise form, improves the orbital energies by more than an order of magnitude. Examples are given for the prototype molecules: dihydrogen, dinitrogen, carbon monoxide, ethylene, formaldehyde, and formic acid. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available