4.3 Article

Reflection machines: increasing meaningful human control over Decision Support Systems

Journal

ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10676-022-09645-y

Keywords

AI ethics; Meaningful human control; Responsibility gap; Human-machine interaction; Decision Support Systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence has increased human reliance on machine decision making. A proposed 'reflection machine' system prompts users to critically evaluate their decisions through question asking. A proof-of-concept implementation of this system has been demonstrated in the medical and law domains.
Rapid developments in Artificial Intelligence are leading to an increasing human reliance on machine decision making. Even in collaborative efforts with Decision Support Systems (DSSs), where a human expert is expected to make the final decisions, it can be hard to keep the expert actively involved throughout the decision process. DSSs suggest their own solutions and thus invite passive decision making. To keep humans actively 'on' the decision-making loop and counter overreliance on machines, we propose a 'reflection machine' (RM). This system asks users questions about their decision strategy and thereby prompts them to evaluate their own decisions critically. We discuss what forms RMs can take and present a proof-of-concept implementation of a RM that can produce feedback on users' decisions in the medical and law domains. We show that the prototype requires very little domain knowledge to create reasonably intelligent critiquing questions. With this prototype, we demonstrate the technical feasibility to develop RMs and hope to pave the way for future research into their effectiveness and value.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available