4.2 Article

It's more about building trust: Physical education teachers' experiences with trauma-informed practices

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 906-922

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1356336X221096603

Keywords

Trauma; trauma-informed practices; physical education; pedagogy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the experiences and knowledge of 27 physical education teachers in the United States regarding trauma and trauma-informed practices. The findings reveal that teachers utilize four dimensions related to trauma-informed strategies. Despite lacking educational experience and professional training, the teachers demonstrate potential in working with students who have experienced trauma.
In schools today, student trauma and toxic stress may impact students' ability to learn. Therefore, this inquiry explored the experiences and knowledge of 27 physical education (PE) teachers in the United States related to trauma and trauma-informed practices. Teachers' experiences were examined through semi-structured interviews informed by the literature. Employing interpretivist philosophical assumptions, data analysis revealed that teachers utilized four general dimensions related to trauma-informed strategies in their gymnasiums: creating a physically safe and emotionally safe space, formulating positive and healthy relationships with students, developing student responsibility, and guiding students toward self-regulation. These strategies aligned with Souers and Hall's (2019) tenets of fostering resilient learners. Although the teachers did not have prior educational experiences with trauma and trauma-informed practices and minimal professional development, they demonstrated what is possible when working with students who experience trauma and/or toxic stress. By fostering resilient learners and engaging in trauma-informed practices, it is conceivable for P-12 students to have positive and inclusive experiences in PE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available