4.3 Review

Statistical Inference of Prehistoric Demography from Frequency Distributions of Radiocarbon Dates: A Review and a Guide for the Perplexed

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL METHOD AND THEORY
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 1387-1418

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-022-09559-5

Keywords

Prehistoric demography; Dates as data; Statistical inference; Radiocarbon dates

Funding

  1. Philip Leverhulme Prize [PLP-2019-304]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the last decade, there has been a rapid increase in studies using time-frequency changes of radiocarbon dates as a proxy for inferring past population dynamics. However, practical applications are not straightforward due to the nature of the proxy. This paper reviews the common criticisms and compares recent methodological advances in the field, concluding with recommendations for applying these techniques in archaeological and paleo-demographic research.
The last decade saw a rapid increase in the number of studies where time-frequency changes of radiocarbon dates have been used as a proxy for inferring past population dynamics. Although its universal and straightforward premise is appealing and undoubtedly offers some unique opportunities for research on long-term comparative demography, practical applications are far from trivial and riddled with issues pertaining to the very nature of the proxy under examination. Here I review the most common criticisms concerning the nature of radiocarbon time-frequency data as a demographic proxy, focusing on key statistical and inferential challenges. I then examine and compare recent methodological advances in the field by grouping them into three approaches: reconstructive, null-hypothesis significance testing, and model fitting. I will then conclude with some general recommendations for applying these techniques in archaeological and paleo-demographic research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available