4.5 Article

FLCSS: A fuzzy-based longest common subsequence method for uncertainty management in trajectory similarity measures

Journal

TRANSACTIONS IN GIS
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 2244-2262

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12958

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research proposes a method called FLCSS based on the longest common subsequence (LCSS), which considers the uncertainty of trajectories caused by positioning and sampling errors using fuzzy theory and the bead model. The results show that FLCSS performs better than other methods in terms of sensitivity to point displacement, noise, and different sampling rates, and has a high correlation with LCSS.
The large quantity of movement data collected from various sources can be inherently uncertain and heterogeneous. In the movement data analysis and mining spectrum, computing the similarity of trajectories while considering the uncertainty and heterogeneity has been less addressed. Generally, two factors of sampling and positioning error cause uncertainty in trajectory databases. Therefore, in this research, a method based on the longest common subsequence (LCSS), named FLCSS, is proposed that uses fuzzy theory and the bead model to consider the uncertainty of trajectories originated from positioning and sampling errors. The performance of FLCSS is evaluated by implementations on real and synthetic datasets, and compared with six important and commonly used similarity measurement methods, namely, LCSS, edit distance on real sequence (EDR), dynamic time warping (DTW), edit distance with real penalty (ERP), Hausdorff distance (HD), and Frechet distance (FD). The results show that FLCSS has a better performance compared to other methods, in terms of sensitivity to point displacement, noise, and different sampling rates. Furthermore, the high correlation between FLCSS and LCSS (rho = 0.91) confirms the robustness of the proposed method in considering uncertainty in the trajectory databases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available