Journal
LANGUAGE IN SOCIETY
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 363-386Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0047404522000094
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article examines the listening practices of England's schools inspectorate and shows how raciolinguistic ideologies are deeply embedded into the sociopolitical culture of the inspectorate, resulting in systems of sonic surveillance that deem nonstandardized language practices of students and teachers as impoverished, deficient, and unsuitable for school.
England has had a schools inspectorate since 1839, first in the form of Her Majesty's Inspectorate (HMI), and since 1992, in the form of the Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills (Ofsted). The inspectorate, a workforce made up of a majority of white inspectors, conduct regular inspections of all state schools in England, producing reports which comment on various aspects of educational provision, including teachers' and students' spoken language. In this article we deploy a raciolinguistic genealogy to examine the listening practices of the inspectorate, drawing on historical inspection reports generated from archival work, inspectorate language policy, and a large corpus of contemporary reports. We show how raciolinguistic ideologies are deeply embedded into the sociopolitical culture of the inspectorate, and how these ideologies translate into systems of sonic surveillance in which the nonstandardised language practices of students and teachers are heard as impoverished, deficient, and unsuitable for school. (Raciolinguistics, schools, language policing, standardised English, Ofsted, England, social class, ideology)
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available