4.7 Article

Calculations of oxide formation on low-index Cu surfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 145, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4959903

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [DMR-1410335]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Division Of Materials Research
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1410335] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Density-functional theory is used to evaluate the mechanism of copper surface oxidation. Reaction pathways of O-2 dissociation on the surface and oxidation of the sub-surface are found on the Cu(100), Cu(110), and Cu(111) facets. At low oxygen coverage, all three surfaces dissociate O-2 spontaneously. As oxygen accumulates on the surfaces, O-2 dissociation becomes more difficult. A bottleneck to further oxidation occurs when the surfaces are saturated with oxygen. The barriers for O-2 dissociation on the O-saturated Cu(100)-c(2x2)-0.5 monolayer (ML) and Cu(100) missing-row structures are 0.97 eV and 0.75 eV, respectively; significantly lower than those have been reported previously. Oxidation of Cu(110)-c(6x2), the most stable (110) surface oxide, has a barrier of 0.72 eV. As the reconstructions grow from step edges, clean Cu(110) surfaces can dissociatively adsorb oxygen until the surface Cu atoms are saturated. After slight rearrangements, these surface areas form a 1 ML oxide structure which has not been reported in the literature. The barrier for further oxidation of this 1 ML phase is only 0.31 eV. Finally the oxidized Cu(111) surface has a relatively low reaction energy barrier for O-2 dissociation, even at high oxygen coverage, and allows for facile oxidation of the subsurface by fast O diffusion through the surface oxide. The kinetic mechanisms found provide a qualitative explanation of the observed oxidation of the low-index Cu surfaces. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available