4.2 Article

A new way to measure partner burden in depression: Construction, validation, and sensitivity to change of the partner burden in depression questionnaire

Journal

JOURNAL OF MARITAL AND FAMILY THERAPY
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 1111-1127

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12584

Keywords

depression; partner burden in depression; relationship quality; social support; system quality

Funding

  1. Mind and Life Institute
  2. Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg
  3. Heidelberg University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Depression in a partner can create significant burden, which is addressed by the Partner Burden in Depression (PBD) questionnaire, measuring observed symptoms and related burden. The PBD is validated in Germany with good psychometric properties and sensitivity to changes, predicting depressive symptoms over time. The PBD provides insights into the effects of depression on partners in a concise and practical way.
Depression occurs in an interpersonal dynamic and living with a depressed person can lead to a significant burden on the partner. Instruments measuring burden do not address couples and often measure caregiving for individuals with schizophrenic disorders. The partner burden in depression (PBD) questionnaire is a new instrument measuring PBD by asking individuals, (1) which symptoms they can observe in their depressed partners and (2) to which degree this burdens them. Hence, PBD combines measuring the awareness of observed depressive symptoms and the resulting burden. Additionally, it addresses aspects unique to couple relationships. Our German validation confirmed a one-factor model with 12 items. The PBD had good psychometric properties and was sensitive to change. Partner burden predicted self-reported depressive symptoms (PHQ-9) over time. PBD is short, easily applicable in research and practice and can add to the understanding of partner effects in depression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available