4.6 Article

Psychosocial risks and benefits of exposure to heavy metal music with aggressive themes: Current theory and evidence

Journal

CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 24, Pages 21133-21150

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03108-9

Keywords

Aggression; Emotion; Heavy metal; Identity; Media violence; Mood; Music psychology; Music perception; Narrative review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Concerns have been raised about the potential risks of prolonged exposure to heavy metal music with aggressive themes, including increased aggression, anger, antisocial behavior, substance use, and mental health problems. However, fans of heavy metal music often derive emotional and social benefits from it, while non-fans tend to report negative psychological experiences.
Concerns have been raised that prolonged exposed to heavy metal music with aggressive themes can increase the risk of aggression, anger, antisocial behaviour, substance use, suicidal ideation, anxiety and depression in community and psychiatric populations. Although research often relies on correlational evidence for which causal inferences are not possible, it is often claimed that music with aggressive themes can cause psychological and behavioural problems. This narrative review of theory and evidence suggests the issues are more complicated, and that fans typically derive a range of emotional and social benefits from listening to heavy metal music, including improved mood, identity formation, and peer affiliation. In contrast, non-fans of heavy metal music - who are often used as participants in experimental research on this topic - invariably report negative psychological experiences. Our review considers a comprehensive set of empirical findings that inform clinical strategies designed to identify fans for whom heavy metal music may confer psychological and behavioural risks, and those for whom this music may confer psychosocial benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available