4.2 Article

Population-Based Teacher-Rated Assessment of Anxiety Among Canadian Kindergarten Children

Journal

CHILD PSYCHIATRY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 1309-1320

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10578-022-01332-9

Keywords

Kindergarten; Anxiety; Early Development Instrument; Canada; Early child development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite being a prevalent mental health problem, there is little data on the pervasiveness and levels of anxiety symptoms in kindergarteners. This study collected data from Canada over a span of 11 years and found that highly anxious children were more likely to be male, have English/French as a second language, and have special needs designation. Furthermore, highly anxious children were more likely to score below the 10th percentile in physical, social, language/cognitive, and communication domains.
Despite anxiety being a prevalent mental health problem in children, little data exist on the pervasiveness and levels of anxiety symptoms in kindergarteners. Data from the Early Development Instrument, a teacher-completed, population-level measure of child development, were collected across Canada from 2004 to 2015. The final analytic sample consisted of 974,319 children of whom 2.6% were classified as highly anxious. Compared to children who exhibited few to none anxious behaviors, highly anxious children were more likely to be male, have English/French as a second language, and have a special needs designation. Furthermore, compared with their less anxious peers, highly anxious children had between 3.5 and 6.1 higher odds of scoring below the 10(th) percentile cut-off in physical, social, language/cognitive and communication domains. Our findings suggest that anxious behaviors are related to children's overall health and illustrate the consistency and extensiveness of anxiety at a very young age among Canadian children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available