4.2 Article

Estrogen modulation of calretinin and BDNF expression in midbrain dopaminergic neurons of ovariectomised mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL NEUROANATOMY
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 60-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2016.05.005

Keywords

Estrogen; Parkinson; Calretinin; BDNF; pAKT

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [31070927]
  2. Natural Science Foundation [CQ CSTC 2013jjB10028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estrogen attenuates the loss of dopamine neurons from the substantia nigra in animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD) and excitatory amino-acid induced neurotoxicity by interactions with brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and calretinin (CR) containing dopaminergic (DA) neurons. To examine this interaction more closely, we treated the ovariectomised (OVX) mice with estrodial for 10 days, and compared these mice to those OVX mice injected with the vehicle or control mice. Estrogen treatment in OVX mice had significantly more tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) positive neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). Dopamine transporter (DAT) mRNA and BDNF mRNA levels in the midbrain were also significantly increased by estrogen treatment (P < 0.05). OVX markedly decreased the number of TH/CR double stained cells in the SNpc (P < 0.05), a trend which could be reversed by estrogen treatment. However, the number of GFAP positive cells in the substantia nigra did not show significant changes (P >0.05) after vehicle or estrodial treatment. Furthermore, we found that estrogen treatment abrogated the OVX-induced decrease in the phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT), but not p-ERIC. We hypothesize that short-term treatment with estrogen confers neuroprotection to DA neurons by increasing CR in the DA neurons and BDNF in the midbrain, which possibly related to activation of the PI3 K/Akt signaling pathway. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available