4.7 Article

QSAR-Driven Discovery of Novel Chemical Scaffolds Active against Schistosoma mansoni

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
Volume 56, Issue 7, Pages 1357-1372

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00055

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CNPq
  2. CAPES
  3. FAPERJ
  4. FAPEG
  5. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM095672]
  6. NIH [GM 096967, GM66940]
  7. CNPq [400760/2014-2]
  8. UNC
  9. MRC [MR/M026221/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [MR/M026221/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease that affects millions of people worldwide. Thioredoxin glutathione reductase of Schistosoma mansoni (SmTGR) is a validated drug target that plays a crucial role in the redox homeostasis of the parasite. We report the discovery of new chemical scaffolds against S. mansoni using a combi-QSAR approach followed by virtual screening of a commercial database and confirmation of top ranking compounds by in vitro experimental evaluation with automated imaging of schistosomula and adult worms. We constructed 2D and 3D quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models using a series of oxadiazoles-2-oxides reported in the literature as SmTGR inhibitors and combined the best models in a consensus QSAR model. This model was used for a virtual screening of Hit2Lead set of ChemBridge database and allowed the identification of ten new potential SmTGR inhibitors. Further experimental testing on both shistosomula and adult worms showed that 4-nitro-3,5-bis(1-nitro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-1H-pyrdzole (LabMol-17) and 3-nitro-4-{[(4-nitro-1,2,5-oxadiazol-3-yl)oxy]methyl}-1,2,5-oxadiazole (LabMol-19), two compounds representing new chemical scaffolds, have high activity in both systems. These compounds will be the subjects for additional testing and, if necessary, modification to serve as new schistosomicidal agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available