4.5 Article

Development of a New Measure of Cognitive Ability Using Automatic Item Generation and Its Psychometric Properties

Journal

SAGE OPEN
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/21582440221095016

Keywords

automatic item generation; longitudinal study; measure of cognitive ability; reliability; validity

Funding

  1. Saban Research Institute of the Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces an innovative measure of cognitive ability based on automatic item generation approach, which can efficiently and effectively measure cognitive ability over time. Its psychometric properties, including content validity, construct validity, and reliability, have been examined and found to support its potential utilities in both educational and clinical settings.
In the development of cognitive science understanding human intelligence and mind, measurement of cognitive ability has played a key role. To address the development in data scientific point of views related to cognitive neuroscience, there has been a demand of creating a measurement to capture cognition in short and repeated time periods. This paper introduces an innovative measure of cognitive ability based on automatic item generation approach, which can efficiently and effectively measure cognitive ability over time. We also examine its psychometric properties. Content validity of the assessment was considered based on the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory, and construct validity via convergent and divergent validities was examined by confirmatory factor analysis. The reliability of the measure examined by internal consistencies as well as test-retest reliabilities of each subdomain of cognitive ability were satisfactory. The psychometric properties found clearly support its potential utilities in both educational and clinical settings, especially in a field requiring repeated measures of cognitive ability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available