4.4 Review

Is work intensification bad for employees? A review of outcomes for employees over the last two decades

Journal

WORK AND STRESS
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 100-125

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2022.2080778

Keywords

Work intensification; outcomes; employees' well-being; narrative review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviewed and analyzed the impact of work intensification on employees, and found that it is associated with negative outcomes such as impaired well-being and motivation. However, not all manifestations of work intensification are always associated with negative outcomes.
Work intensification (WI) is a notable job stressor, which has been hypothesised to result in various negative outcomes for employees. However, earlier empirical studies regarding this stressor hypothesis have not yet been reviewed. Our narrative review focused on the outcomes for employees of WI as a perceived job stressor. Our review was based on selected qualitative and quantitative empirical studies (k = 44) published in peer-reviewed journals between the years 2000 and 2020. Altogether, the findings of these studies showed that WI was related to various negative outcomes for employees, such as impaired well-being and motivation, supporting the stressor hypothesis. Stressful WI manifested as perceived accelerated pace of work and increased effort and demands for effectivity at work. Nevertheless, other manifestations of WI (e.g. increased demands for learning) were not always associated with negative outcomes. The implications of these findings are discussed together with future directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available