4.2 Article

EFL literacy instruction as reflected in elementary school textbooks in Israel

Journal

READING AND WRITING
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 29-49

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-022-10301-6

Keywords

English as a foreign language (EFL); Theory-based literacy instruction; EFL textbooks; EFL literacy instruction components

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the alignment between literacy instruction components and theory in EFL textbooks used in elementary schools in Israel through teacher self-reports. The findings indicate that the textbooks inadequately cover theory-based instructional materials for different literacy components.
Israel is one of many countries in which English is not the spoken language. In these countries, it is of the utmost importance for students to acquire literacy in English as a foreign language (EFL) to support their entry into higher education and enhance their social and business opportunities. However, many students do not acquire adequate literacy skills by the conclusion of their elementary school years. To obtain these skills, the curriculum as reflected in EFL textbooks must include extensive and accurate content related to the constructs of the English language. This study aimed to explore to what extent literacy instruction components, as defined by research, are incorporated into textbooks that are commonly used for teaching EFL in elementary schools in Israel according to teacher self-reports. The textbook examination was based on the research-based literacy components aligned with the Science of Reading for English as a first language and on additional EFL literacy instruction components. The findings indicate that textbooks inadequately cover theory-based instructional materials for each of the literacy components. The conclusions of this study can be used to raise awareness regarding how EFL literacy instruction in Israel may be improved by providing theory-based textbooks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available