4.1 Article Data Paper

Proteome data of neuroblastoma cells overexpressing Neuroglobin

Journal

DATA IN BRIEF
Volume 41, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.107843

Keywords

Proteomics; Neuroglobin; Label-free quantification; LC-MS/MS; S-Trap; MaxQuant; Perseus; MetaboAnalyst

Funding

  1. PRIN (Progetti di Ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale) [2017SNRXH3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the proteome of human neuroblastoma cells overexpressing Neuroglobin (NGB) was analyzed. The results revealed 178 differentially expressed proteins associated with NGB overexpression. These findings provide important insights into the neuroprotective mechanism of NGB.
In this article, we present data on the proteome of human neuroblastoma cells stably overexpressing Neuroglobin (NGB). The neuroprotective role of NGB is clearly established, nevertheless the related mechanistic processes, which are dependent on NGB overexpression, are not known. To address this question, we performed shotgun label-free quantification (LFQ) proteomics using an SH-SY5Y cell model of neuroblastoma that overexpresses an NGB-FLAG construct, and wild type cells transfected with an empty vector as control (CTRL). The proteomes from six biological samples per condition were digested using the S-Trap sample preparation followed by LC-MS/MS analysis with a LTQ-Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer. The quantitative analysis was performed using the LFQ algorithm of MaxQuant, leading to 1654 correctly quantified proteins over 2580 identified proteins. Finally, the statistic comparison of the two analyzed groups within Perseus platform identified 178 differential proteins (107 up- and 71 down-regulated). In addition, multivariate statistical analysis was carried out using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 software. MS proteomics data are available via ProteomeX-change with the dataset identifier PXD029012. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available