4.1 Article Data Paper

Data, metrics, and methods for arthropod and fungal herbivory at the dawn of angiosperm diversification: The Rose Creek plant assemblage of Nebraska, U.S.A

Journal

DATA IN BRIEF
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108170

Keywords

Cretaceous angiosperm flora; Herbivory richness and intensity; Host-plant specialization; Feeding event occurrences; Rarefaction analyses; Component communities; Non-metric multidimensional scaling; Functional feeding group stoichiometry

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41688103, 32020103006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents data on arthropod and fungal herbivory on plant specimens from the Early Cretaceous Rose Creek locality in Nebraska, USA. The data sets provide a comprehensive description of the diversity and intensity of herbivory, along with appendices and figures for reference.
The data presented in this article are related to the research article titled Arthropod and fungal herbivory at the dawn of angiosperm diversification: The Rose Creek plant assemblage of Nebraska, U.S.A. (Xiao et al., 2021). These data correspond to an examination of arthropod and fungal herbivory on 2084 plant specimens from the Early Cretaceous (late Albian) Rose Creek locality of southeastern Nebraska, USA. Ten datasets have been assembled to describe and contextualize the diversity and intensity of herbivory at Rose Creek, as documented in Appendices of the online supplementary material. Appendices S4 and S5 provide a list and the frequency distributions by major clade and species/morphotype of all plant taxa examined. Appendix S6 outlines general procedures for documenting herbivory on plants and how the data was acquired. Appendix S9a and S9b provide rarefaction analyses for plant taxa to demonstrate sampling sufficiency, which is paralleled by rarefaction analyses of Appendix S9c and S9d that indicate sampling of damage types are robust. The comprehensive dataset of Appendix S12 lists plant taxa horizontally by major clade/group and species/morphotype versus vertically listed feeding classes, functional feeding groups (FFGs) and damage types (DTs). The basic metrics of DTs, feeding event occurrences, DT host-plant specialization, and number of matrix cells are displayed, with data subtotals and totals. This data matrix serves as the central source of data for the study, and records the six metrics of DT richness, DT frequency, DT host-plant specialization, percent of area herbivorized, and feeding event occurrences. Three of these metrics are used for establishing component community structure of the three most herbivorized taxa (Figs 8-10), and the relationships among plant hosts and FFGs in the non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis (Fig. 11) (Xiao et al., 2021). Appendix S15 is a list DTs, with their assigned host-plant specialization of 1 for generalized, 2 for intermediate specificity, and 3 for specialized. Appendix S16 is a table that provides plant surface areas (cm(2)) and their percentages that have been removed due to herbivory. Appendix S18 provides descriptions and ancillary data for 14 new DTs described from Rose Creek. A listing of the herbivory index (herbivorized surface area divided by to-tal surface area) of plant assemblages and individual plant species in Appendix S19 provides comparisons among Rose Creek, other fossil, and modern plant assemblages. Lastly, Appendix S23 lists from the literature of arthropod species forming the well-documented herbivore component communities of five modern plant species to the three most herbivorized taxa at Rose Creek shown in Fig. 12. Some of the metrics used to quantitatively measure the diversity and intensity of herbivory are recent, such as feeding event occurrences, whereas others such as herbivorized surface area and host-plant specialization values have had a longer use in plant-arthropod studies. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available